The ongoing debate surrounding student assessment often raises the question: Are grades truly reflecting student learning and potential? Traditional grading systems have been criticized for their limitations; they often fail to capture a student's true understanding or mastery of a subject. Letter grades can be inflexible, reducing the complexity of learning into a simplistic scale that does not accommodate diverse learning styles. Furthermore, standardized testing has been shown to negatively impact student mental health, leading to anxiety and disengagement [1][2]. As such, there is a growing movement advocating for alternative assessment methods that prioritize learning over mere performance metrics. Emerging alternatives include formative assessment techniques, project-based learning assessments, and peer and self-assessment strategies. These methods provide ongoing feedback, encourage real-world applications of knowledge, and foster student autonomy, respectively. By shifting focus from grades to these innovative approaches, educators can create a more engaging learning environment that enhances intrinsic motivation and promotes deeper understanding [3]. For instance, formative assessments allow teachers to gauge student progress continuously, providing timely support that helps learners grow rather than simply labeling them with a grade. Ultimately, the conversation around assessment is not just about how students are evaluated but also about how these evaluations impact their motivation and engagement. Positive assessment practices can enhance a student's willingness to learn and improve, while constructive feedback plays a crucial role in their development. Schools that have implemented these innovative assessment strategies often report improved student outcomes, showcasing the potential benefits of rethinking how we measure learning [1][3].